Pure water being a weak electrolyte under goes self ionization to a small extent as follows:
The equilibrium constant for this reaction is: 
The concentration of unionized water is taken as constant because the degree on ionization of water is very small. So we can write this equation as:
where Kw is a constant and is known as the ionic product of water whose value is 1.008 x 10–14 mol2 dm–6 at 298 K. In pure water the concentration of H3O+ and OH– are equal and so we can write,
[H3O+] = [OH–]
If, Kw = [H3O+] [OH–] = 1.008 x 10-14 mol2 dm–6 then,
[H3O+] [OH–] = 1.008 x 10-14
[H3O+]2 = 1.008 x 10-14
Thus in pure water [H3O+] = [OH–] = 1.0 x 10–7 mol dm–3 at 298 K
The value of Kw varies with the change in temperature. The values of [H3O+] and [OH–] are always equal to each other at all temperatures but the values of Kw are different at different temperatures. The value of Kwincreases with the rise in temperature. This is because increase in temperature will shift the equilibrium in the forward direction producing large concentrations of [H3O+] and [OH–] ions (Le Chatelier’s principle).
Hence, Kw increases with rise in temperature.
It can be concluded that the hydronium and hydroxyl ions are always present in solution whether they are acidic or basic. However their concentrations differ.
An acid HA takes part in the following proton transfer equilibrium in water
HA(aq) + H2O(l) ⇌ H3O+(aq) + A–(aq)
In this expression, A– is the conjugate base of the acid.
In dilute solution, the concentration of water is constant and the equilibrium can be expressed in terms of the equilibrium constant, Ka.
Ka is the ionisation constant or dissociation constant of the acid.
For acetic acid
Ka is a measure of the acidic strength of the acid.
• For a base B in water, the characteristic proton transfer equilibrium is
B(aq) + H2O(l) ⇌ BH+(aq) + OH–(aq)
Here, BH+ is the conjugate acid. In dilute solutions concentration of H2O is constant.
Kb is the ionisation or dissociation constant of the base. It is a measure of the strength of the base.
For Ammonia,
NH3(aq) + H2O (l) ⇌ NH4+(aq) + OH–(aq)
Kb = ( [NH4+] [OH¯] ) / [NH3]
Kb is a measure of the strength of the base.
Let BH+ be the conjugate acid of a base, then the expression for the acidic constant Ka for the conjugate acid:
[B] [H+] Ka = --------- [BH+] [B] [H+] [OH-] = --------- ------ [BH+] [OH-] [B] = ----------- [H+] [OH-] [BH+] [OH-] 1 = --- Kw Kb
Thus, Ka Kb = Kw
Furthermore,
– log ( Ka) – log (Kb) = -log (Kw)
and at 298 K, we have
p Ka + pKb = 14
• Weak acids and weak bases partially dissociate in water leading to equilibria
• Strong acids like HCl, HNO3 and strong bases like NaOH completely ionise in water.
Therefore, the H+ and OH– concentration can be directly computed considering the
dissociation.
An acid of the type HA can undergo ionization when dissolved in water as,
If ‘n’ moles of the acid are dissolved in ‘V’ units of volume (litres L) and ‘a‘ is the degree of ionization, then the equilibrium amounts of various species and the concentration in moles per litre in the solution are,
Note that 1 L = 1 dm3
where ‘C’ is the molar concentration of the acid. The ionization constant for the above reaction is given by,
where ‘V’ is the volume of the solution in litres containing one mole of the acid HA. As the degree of ionization increases with-dilution then, the hydronium ion or hydrogen ion concentration is given by,
The ionization of a weak base is characterized by the equilibrium,
If ‘n’ moles of the base are dissolved in ‘V’ units of volume (litres L) and a is the degree of ionization, then the equilibrium amounts of various species and the concentration in moles per litre in the solution are,
where ‘C’ is the molar concentration of the base. The ionization constant for the above reaction is given by,
If ‘α‘ is small then 1 – α ≈ 1
Hence, Kb = Cα2
where ‘V’ is the volume of the solution in litres containing one mole of the base MOH. As the degree of ionization increases with dilution then, the hydroxide concentration is given by,
• The concentration of hydronium ions [H3O+] in aqueous solutions is sometimes very small. Hydronium ion concentration of a medium is very important in industrial processes, pollution, acid rain, blood and body chemistry. In many cases its concentration ranges from 10-14 to 10 mol dm-3 in aqueous solutions.
• Therefore it is convenient to express the [H3O+] of solutions on logarithmic scale. The negative logarithm of hydronium ions or hydrogen ions concentration is called pH. The ‘p’ in the term pH means power and ‘H+‘ stands for hydronium ions or hydrogen ions. The pH is defined mathematically as,
• The negative sign in the definition means that the pH decreases as the hydrogen ion (hydronium ion) concentration increases. A change of one unit in the pH scale corresponds to tenfold change in the hydrogen ion concentration.
• It is assumed that all strong acids are completely ionised in aqueous solution. The hydronium ion concentration is obtained directly from the concentration of the acid. For monoprotic strong acids [H3O+] is equal to its molar concentration.
Eg. If the concentration of hydrochloric acid solution is 0.1 mol dm-3.
HCl(aq) + H2O(l) → H3O+(aq) + Cl–(aq)
∴ [H3O+(aq) ] = 0.1 mol dm-3
-log10 0.1 = 1
∴ pH = 1
• Molecules of diprotic strong acids such as sulphuric acid dissociates completely in dilute solutions.
H2SO4(aq) + 2H2O(l) → 2H3O+ (aq) + SO42- (aq)
In 0.1 mol dm-3 sulphuric acid solution, [H3O+(aq)] = 0.2 mol dm-3 (assuming complete dissociation)
log10 0.2 = -0.7
∴ -log10 0.2 = 0.7
∴ pH = 0.7
• Strong bases are also assumed to be completely ionised. The hydroxide ion concentration is therefore easily obtained from the concentration of the base.
eg. Consider 0.3 mol dm-3 solution of sodium hydroxide.
NaOH (aq) → Na+(aq) + OH–(aq)
[OH–(aq)] = 0.3 mol dm-3
• The hydrogen ion concentration of the solution is determined by the ionic product of water. At 298 K the ionic product is 1×10-14 mol2 dm-6. Hydrogen ion concentration at this temperature is given by
• A weak acid does not ionise fully in aqueous solution
By applying equilibrium law,
the degree of dissociation is α and the initial concentration of HA is C
pH = -log10√(KaC)
Similarly
pOH = -log10√(KbC)
Let’s take the simplest example absolute; sodium chloride, NaCl. The constituent ions are Na+ and Cl–. The acid-base theory of Bronsted-Lowry has taught us that the more strong the base the weaker it will be its conjugate acid and vice versa, the more strong the acid the weaker will be its conjugate base.
In this case, we have Na+, which is the conjugate acid of NaOH, and Cl–, which is the conjugate base of HCl. NaOH is a strong base, and in the same way HCl is a strong acid. It follows that the Na+ acid behavior and Cl– basic behavior are totally irrelevant.
If none of the two ions interacts with H2O then we will have no pH changes.
It follows that the pH of an aqueous solution of NaCl is neutral, 7.
The salts derived from strong acid and strong base leave unchanged the pH of a solution.
Take for example the sodium acetate, CH3COONa. And ‘it is including respectively CH3COO– and Na+. Na+ is the conjugate acid of NaOH,and as we saw in the previous example, its contribution to the pH is null. CH3COO– instead it is the conjugate base of CH3COOH, a weak acid. As the conjugate base of a weak acid, it shows a certain affinity towards the proton, and it behaves then as a base:
The acid-base reaction of CH3COO– with water is called “hydrolysis.” In this case we are speaking of basic hydrolysis, because the reaction generates an excess of OH– .Since the reaction generates this excess, the salt of a weak acid and a strong base in water give a pH> 7, therefore alkaline. For the calculation of pH, we can consider the solution of this salt exactly as the solution of just a weak base (in our case CH3COO–). We have seen that the formula for calculating generated resulting from a weak base is:
The Kb of the weak base CH3COO– can be obtained from Ka of acetic acid as it follows:
The base concentration in this case is the concentration of our salt.
From this considerations the formula for calculating the a salt-strong base weak acid solution:
pOH = -log10√(KwC/Ka)
Take for example the ammonium chloride, NH4Cl. Its constituent ions are NH4+ and Cl– .NH4+ is the conjugate acid of NH3, ammonia, a weak base. It will therefore have a tendency, altough small, to cede that acid hydrogen. Cl– instead is the conjugate base of HCl, and as we have seen in the examples above its contribution to the pH is practically zero, and then we can overlook it. We can simply consider a solution of this salt as an aqueous solution of the weak acid NH4+ (which will then give an acid pH)
The approximate formula to calculate the pH of a weak acid is the following:
The Ka of the ammonium ion can be easily obtained from the Kb of ammonia. The concentration of acid in the formula, Ca , is therefore in this case the concentration Cs of our salt.
Let’s take for example ammonium acetate, CH3COONH4. The constituent ions are CH3COO– and NH4+. Both of these ions are able to give hydrolysis (as we have seen in the previous examples); CH3COO– gives basic hydrolysis, while acid hydrolysis is given by NH4+ .The pH of a salt composed of weak acid and weak base will depend on the strength relationship of the acidic and basic components of the salt. If the base strength and the acid strength are equal the result is a neutral solution. And that’s right the case for example of CH3COONH4 .
Ka NH4+ = Kb CH3COO–
If base strength is prevailing on acid strength the salt will give the solution an alkaline pH. And that’s the case for example of NH4CN.
Kb CN– > Ka NH4+
If the prevailing acid strength on the base strength of course the result will be an acid pH.
In any case if we want to exactly calculate the pH of a salt formed by weak acid and weak base (also what we called a neutral solution if we wanted to be accurate, has to be calculated like this because Ka and Kb are always at least slightly different), there is a very simple formula:
In which:
– Ka is the constant of the conjugate acid of the weak base which forms the salt. For example, in the case of CH3COONH4 would be the Ka of CH3COOH.
– Kb is the constant of the conjugate base of the weak acid that constitutes the salt. For example, in the case of CH3COONH4 would be the Kbof NH3.
pH Determination
The pH value of a solution can be determined using
• indicators
• indicator papers
• pH meter
Theory of indicators
Any acid – base indicator is a weak acid or a weak base. They show one colour below a certain pH value and another colour above a certain pH value.
Consider acid-base indicator as weak acid which can be represented as HIn which takes part in the following equilibrium.
HIn(aq) + H2O(l) ⇌ H3O+(aq) + In–(aq)
Colour I Colour II
Instead of Ka the equilibrium is described by the constant KIn to show that indicator is used.
KIn = [H3O+(aq)][In–(aq)]/[HIn(aq)]
-log10KIn = -log10[H3O+(aq)]- -log10[In–(aq)]- (-log10[HIn(aq)])
pKIn = pH + log10[In–(aq)]/[HIn(aq)]
The HIn and In– are of two different colours.
The addition of acid to this solution will push the equilibrium to the left and the colour of HIn will become prominent.
Addition of alkali will result in the equilibrium moving to the right since the OH – will remove the H3O+ ion from the equilibrium and the colour of In– will become prominent.
Colour I displayed at a lower pH may be called ‘lower colour’ and the colour II shown at higher pH can be called the’ higher colour’.
When the pH of the solution becomes equal to pKIn, an intermediate colour of an equimolar mixture of HIn and In– is shown.
When the pH range of a particular indicator is equal to pKIn + 1 and pKIn – 1 the colour change occurs over a pH range of about 2 units.
• To select the suitable indicator for a particular titration, pH range of the colour change of the indicator should be in the abrupt pH range (vertical portion) that embraces equivalence point of the titration.
• If pH at equilibrium of a titration is equal to the pKIn of an indicator, that indicator fits well for that titration.
| Indicator | Color | pKIn | pH range | |
| Acid | Base | |||
| Thymol Blue – 1st change | red | yellow | 1.5 | 1.2 – 2.8 |
| Methyl Orange | red | yellow | 3.7 | 3.2 – 4.4 |
| Bromocresol Green | yellow | blue | 4.7 | 3.8 – 5.4 |
| Methyl Red | yellow | red | 5.1 | 4.8 – 6.0 |
| Bromothymol Blue | yellow | blue | 7.0 | 6.0 – 7.6 |
| Phenol Red | yellow | red | 7.9 | 6.8 – 8.4 |
| Thymol Blue – 2nd change | yellow | blue | 8.9 | 8.0 – 9.6 |
| Phenolphthalein | colorless | magenta | 9.4 | 8.2 – 10.0 |
Calculation of pH value of acid-base reactions at different points and drawing pH curves
• The point at which the reaction completed is called the equivalence point. At the equivalence point of a strong acid- strong base titration,
[H +(aq)] = [ OH – (aq)]
• In strong acid –strong base titration neither cation (eg. Na+, K+) nor the anion (eg. HCl–,NO3–) undergoes hydrolysis at the equivalence point. Therefore, pH at equivalence point is 7.0. Here pH at the equivalence point is determined only by the dissociation of H2O.
• But in other titrations cations of weak base and anions of weak acid undergo hydrolysis and determine the pH of the resulting solution.
We’ll take hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide as typical of a strong acid and a strong base.
• Titration shows a rapid change in pH from 3 – 11 around its equivalence point. Hence any indicator having pKIn in this range can be used to detect the end point of the titration.
eg. Methyl orange (pKIn = 3.7), Bromothymol blue (pKIn = 7),Phenolpthalene (pKIn = 9.6)
• When concentrations of reactants are low the range in which a rapid change is shown becomes narrow.
We’ll take ethanoic acid and sodium hydroxide as typical of a weak acid and a strong base.
The start of the graph shows a relatively rapid rise in pH but this slows down as a buffer solution containing ethanoic acid and sodium ethanoate is produced. Beyond the equivalence point (when the sodium hydroxide is in excess) the curve is just the same as that end of the HCl – NaOH graph.
For the above titration a rapid change in pH shows around 7.5 to 10. Therefore, the suitable indicator is phenolpthalene. (pKIn = 9.6)
Because you have got a weak base, the beginning of the curve is obviously going to be different. However, once you have got an excess of acid, the curve is essentially the same as before.
At the very beginning of the curve, the pH starts by falling quite quickly as the acid is added, but the curve very soon gets less steep. This is because a buffer solution is being set up – composed of the excess ammonia and the ammonium chloride being formed.
For the above titration a rapid change in pH shows around 3 to 6. Therefore, one of the
suitable indicators is methyl orange.
(4) For weak acid – weak base titrations there is no rapid change in pH around the equivalence point. Therefore, it is very difficult to accurately detect the end point by using an indicator.
The overall equation for the reaction between sodium carbonate solution and dilute hydrochloric acid is:
If you had the two solutions of the same concentration, you would have to use twice the volume of hydrochloric acid to reach the equivalence point – because of the 1 : 2 ratio in the equation.
Suppose you start with 25 cm3 of sodium carbonate solution, and that both solutions have the same concentration of 1 mol dm-3. That means that you would expect the steep drop in the titration curve to come after you had added 50 cm3 of acid.
The actual graph looks like this:
The graph is more complicated than you might think – and curious things happen during the titration.
You expect carbonates to produce carbon dioxide when you add acids to them, but in the early stages of this titration, no carbon dioxide is given off at all.
Then – as soon as you get past the half-way point in the titration – lots of carbon dioxide is suddenly released.
The graph is showing two end points – one at a pH of 8.3 (little more than a point of inflexion), and a second at about pH 3.7. The reaction is obviously happening in two distinct parts.
In the first part, complete at A in the diagram, the sodium carbonate is reacting with the acid to produce sodium hydrogencarbonate:
You can see that the reaction doesn’t produce any carbon dioxide.
In the second part, the sodium hydrogencarbonate produced goes on to react with more acid – giving off lots of CO2.
That reaction is finished at B on the graph.
It is possible to pick up both of these end points by careful choice of indicator. That is explained on the separate page on indicators.
• It can be shown either by calculation or using pH papers that pH of chemically pure water can be changed by 3 units by adding 1 cm3 of 0.1 mol dm-3 HCl or NaOH to 1.0 dm3 of water. This shows that a small amount of an acid or an alkali can cause a drastic change in pH. But there are solutions/systems that can resist such changes.
• A buffer solution is a one which resists the change in pH on addition of a small amount of H+ or OH– or water.
• The following table shows how pH changes when the given volumes of a 0.1 mol dm-3 NaOH solution are added to 50.00 cm3 of a 0.1 mol dm-3 CH3COOH solution.
• According to the above table, the change in pH in between the addition of 10.00 cm3 and 25.00 cm3of NaOH solution is very small showing that in this range, the system is resistant to the change in pH brought about by the addition of NaOH. This action is called buffer action.
• Solutions containing a weak acid and its conjugate base act as buffers.
eg. CH3COOH and CH3COONa.
• Solutions containing a weak base and its conjugate acid also act as buffers.
eg. NH4OH and NH4Cl.
CH3COONa(aq) → CH3-(aq) + Na+(aq) (Complete dissociation)
CH3COOH(aq) + H2O(l) ⇌ CH3COO–(aq) + H3O+(aq) (Incomplete dissociation)
When H3O+ ions are added to the system, they are removed by the CH3COO– ion forming weakly dissociated CH3COOH. Therefore, pH almost remains constant
When a small amount of OH– ions are added to the system, they are immediately removed forming almost unionised water.
OH–(aq) + H3O+(aq) ⇌ 2H2O(l)
More CH3COOH ionises to replenish the lost H3O+, so pH remains almost constant.
NH4OH(aq) ⇌ NH4+(aq) + OH–(aq)
NH4Cl(aq) → NH4+(aq) + Cl–(aq)
When a small amount of an acid is added, H+ ions are removed by the OH– forming water and more NH4OH ionises restoring the OH– ions. Hence, pH does not change widely. When an alkali is added, OH– ions combine with NH4 + to form NH4OH bringing down the OH– concentration. Hence, pH approximately remains constant.
Here is the dissociation equation for HA:
HA ⇌ H+ + A–
From which, we write the Ka expression:
take the negative log of each of the three terms in the above equation. They become:
1) -log [H+]
2) – log Ka
3) -log ([HA] / [A¯])
However,
1) this is the pH
2) this is the pKa
3) to get rid of the negative sign flip the log term to get this: + log ([A¯] / [HA])
Inserting these last three items (the pH, the pKa and the rearranged log term), we arrive at the Henderson-Hasselbalch Equation:
Here is a common way the HH equation is presented in a textbook explanation:
Remember that, in a buffer, the two substances differ by only a proton. The substance with the proton is the acid and the substance without the proton is the salt.
However, remember that the salt of a weak acid is a base (and the salt of a weak base is an acid).
Consequently, another common way to write the Henderson equation is to substitute “base” for “salt form” (sometimes you will see “conjugate base” or “base form”). This is probably the most useful way to decribe the interactions between the acidic form (the HA) and the basic form (the A¯).
Here it is:
The alternate form starts from the ionization equation for a generic base called B:
B + H2O ⇌ HB+ + OH¯
By the way, here is an example of the above generic equation, using ammonia:
NH3 + H2O ⇌ NH4+ + OH¯
The B simply represents the entire base and HB+ represents the substances with an additional H+.
Next, we write the Kb expression for this reaction:
Next, we isolate the [OH¯] on the left-hand side of the equation:
We negative log each of the three terms of the above equation to give pOH, pKb and we flip the third term so as to make it an addition, not a subtraction.
Here is the alternate form of the Henderson-Hasselbalch Equation, expressed in terms of pOH and pKb:
• Rate of a reaction can be defined as the change of concentration (either decrease of
concentration of reactants or increase of concentration in products) within a unit time.
• Factors affecting rate of reactions
– Temperature
– Concentration (Pressure)
– Physical nature (Surface area of reactants)
– Catalysts (Heterogeneous/Homogeneous)
• Equal volumes of water (10.0 cm3) are added to test tubes along with two pieces of magnesium ribbon of 2 cm long. Apparatus are arranged as in the diagram keeping all the factors identical except the concentration of an acid by adding 2 drops of a hydrochloric acid solution to one test tube and 4 drops of the same solution to the other.
• Gas bubbles evolve faster in the test tube containing acid in higher concentration.
• It can be concluded that concentration affects the rate of a reaction.
• Apparatus are set as shown in the diagram keeping all the factors identical except
temperature.
• It can be seen that the solution kept at higher temperature decolourizes faster.
• Therefore, temperature affects the rate of a reaction.
• To two test tubes separately add a lump of CaCO3 and CaCO3 powder of equal mass.
• To each test tube, add equal volumes of a HCl solution of the same concentration (e.g.0.01 mol dm-3)
• Keep both tubes in a water bath.
• Observe the difference in the rates of evolution of gas.
• Emphasize the need to immerse in a water bath.
• It can be observed that the tube containing CaCO3 powder effervesces faster.
• Thus, it can be concluded that the physical nature of reactants affects the rate of a reaction.
• Add 10.0 cm3 samples of ’20 volume’ H2O2 to two boiling tubes. (’20 volume’ means that unit volume of H2O2 solution gives twenty volumes of O2 at STP)
• Add 5.0 cm-3 of water to one tube and 5.0 cm3 of 0.1 mol dm-3 NaOH to the other.
• It is seen that gas bubbles evolve faster in the tube with NaOH.
• This leads to the conclusion that NaOH increases the rate of decomposition of H2O2.
(a) Homogeneous catalysts : If the catalyst and the reactants are in the same phase, they are called homogeneous catalysts.
(b) Heterogeneous catalysts : If the catalyst and the reactants are in different phases, they are heterogeneous catalysts.
Consider a chemical reaction
aA + bB → cC + dD
rate with respect to the change of concentration of the reactant A = – Δ[A]/Δt
rate with respect to the change of concentration of the product D = Δ[D]/Δt
• In a given reaction, the rates of removal of each reactant and rates of formation of each products are not equal.
• The rate of removal of a reactant or formation of a product depends on the stoichiometric coefficients of the respective substances.
rate of reaction = – (1/a)Δ[A]/Δt = -(1/b)Δ[B]/Δt = (1/c)Δ[C]/Δt = (1/d)Δ[D]/Δt
• Rate law for the above generalized equation = k [A] x [B] y, where x and y are
order of reaction with respect to reactants A and B respectively.
• (x + y) of the above expression is referred as the overall order of the reaction.
Example
Express the rate of the reaction given, in terms of reactants and product concentrations.
The rate of the reaction is expressed as
Ammonia (NH3) gas decomposes over platinum catalyst to nitrogen gas (N2) and hydrogen gas (H2). The chemical reaction is as follows:
The reaction follows zero order kinetics. Therefore the rate law is rate r = k[NH3]o
For a zero order reaction the concentration versus time profile is linear and the rate of reaction versus time has the profile.
Rate of reaction versus time for a zero order reaction
Cyclopropane (C3H6) at room temperature has a ring structure. When it is heated, the ring opens up and cyclopropane isomerizes to propylene.
The reaction takes place in a first order manner. Therefore, the rate law for the reaction is, rate (r) = k [C3H6]1
The above figure is an example of the first order reaction. The rate of the reaction depends on the concentration of the reactant. Initially the rate is fast and then it slows down as the concentration of the reactant falls.
Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) gas reacts with fluorine gas (F2) to give nitrosyl fluoride. The chemical reaction is given by the equation.
The reaction has the rate law as:
rate (r) = k [NO2] [F2]
The rate has order one with respect to nitrogen dioxide concentration and fluorine concentration and the overall order is (1 + 1) which is two.
This depicts the change of concentration of second order reaction with only one reactant, that is, a reaction of the type A 
P where the rate law is rate r = k [A]2.
Requirements : 250 cm3 of 0.1 mol dm-3 H2SO4 , Six pieces of 2.0 cm cleaned magnesium ribbon.
Method
Mg(s) + H2SO4(aq) → MgSO4(aq) + H2(g)
• Into a boiling tube, 10.0 cm3 of water is added and marked with a rubber band.
• Into the same boiling tube, 40.0 cm3 of 0.1 mol dm-3 H2SO4 is added and filled with water brimfully.
• The cleaned magnesium ribbon is fixed as shown in the diagram to the bung, the tube is closed with the bung and turned upside down while switching on the stop watch simultaneously.
• Time taken by the gas to fill up to the level of the rubber band is measured.
• Measurement of time is repeated for different solutions tabulated below, every time
fixing a fresh Mg ribbon.
•Calculate the concentration of each acid solution and plot a graph between [H+] and 1/t.
R ∝ [H+]n
Initial rate = Average rate for a small change from the starting point
= Volume of gas produced/Time = Constant/Time = k/t
R ∝ 1/t
[H+]n ∝ 1/t
Requirements : 0.10 mol dm-3 Na2S2O3 solution. 2.0 mol dm-3 HCl solution, stop
watch, boiling tubes, measuring cylinders, 50 cm3 beaker.
S2O32-(aq) + 2H+(aq) → S(s) + SO2(g) + H2O(l)
Method
• Given volume of Na2S2O3 solution as shown in the table is added to a 50 cm3 beaker.
• The beaker containing the Na2S2O3 solution is kept on a white paper marked with a cross. Relevant volume of the HCl solution is added and the time to disappear the cross is measured keeping the eye at a constant height from the beaker.
• The beaker is cleaned and the experiment is repeated mixing the solutions given in the table below.
(i) Determining the relationship between the reaction rate and the thiosulphate ion concentration.
The experiment is done using thiosulphate solutions of different concentrations as given in the table.
R ∝ [S2O32-(aq)]n
(ii) Determining the relationship between the reaction rate and the concentration of hydrogen ions.
The experiment is done using acid solutions of different concentrations as given in the
table.
R ∝ [H+]n
In both the above instances, assume that the rate is constant during the period of measurement of time taken to disappear cross and it is equal to the initial rate. Then, Rate = constant / t
In both instances examine how concentration varies with 1/t.
2Fe3+(aq) + 2I–(aq) → I2(aq) + 3Fe2+(aq)
The amount of I2 produced can be used to determine the rate of this reaction. The
minimum iodine concentration required to turn starch blue is 1.0×10-5 mol dm-3. Since this is very small, measuring time is difficult. Therefore, time taken to appear blue colour should be delayed to measure the time. This can be affected through a faster reaction which converts I2 to I–. For this Na2S2O3 can be used.
2S2O32-(aq) + I2(aq) → S4O2-(aq) + 2I–(aq)
A known amount of Na2S2O3 is added to the medium. The moment in which Na2S2O3 is over, the solution turns blue. The amount of I2 formed depends on the amount of Na2S2O3 added
Requirements :
0.10 mol dm-3 KI solution, 0.10 mol dm-3 FeCl3 or Fe(NH4)(SO4)2 solution,
0.10 mol dm-3 Na2S2O3 solution, 0.10 mol dm-3 H2SO4 solution, stopwatch
Mix the solutions given in the above table as shown here. Measure the time taken to turn the solution blue.
In both instances examine how rate (1/t) varies with concentration.
According to the shape of the graph, order of the reaction (n) can be determined.
We calculate the average rate of a reaction over a time interval by dividing the change in concentration over that time period by the time interval. For the change in concentration of a reactant, the equation, where the brackets mean “concentration of”, is
An instantaneous rate is the rate at some instant in time. An instantaneous rate is a differential rate: -d[reactant]/dt or d[product]/dt.
We determine an instantaneous rate at time t:
The initial rate of a reaction is the instantaneous rate at the start of the reaction (i.e., when t = 0). The initial rate is equal to the negative of the slope of the curve of reactant concentration versus time at t = 0.
Half life of a reaction is defined as the time required for reducing the concentration of a reactant to half its initial value. It is denoted as t1/2.
The t1/2 of a zero order reaction is given as
while for the first order reaction it is given as
Only for the first order reaction t1/2 is independent of the initial concentration of the reactant. This relation can be used to determine the order of a reaction.
Elementary reactions are classified according to their molecularity. The number of reacting species, which are involved in simultaneous collision to bring about a chemical reaction is called the molecularity of the reaction. In a unimolecular reaction, a single molecule shakes itself apart or its atoms into a new arrangement.
Example
Decomposition of NH4NO2 to N2 and 2 H2O
Bimolecular reactions involve the collision of pair of molecules. Bimolecular reactions are common.
Example :
Oxidation of nitric oxide by ozone
Intermolecular reactions, three molecules collide simultaneously. Such reactions are rare.
Molecularity is defined for elementary reactions where as order corresponds to the overall reaction. The overall reaction might involve one elementary reaction or it might involve a sequence of elementary reactions (a sequence of elementary reactions denotes a complex reaction).
The rate determining step
The overall rate of a reaction (the one which you would measure if you did some experiments) is controlled by the rate of the slowest step. In the example above, the hydroxide ion can’t combine with the positive ion until that positive ion has been formed. The second step is in a sense waiting around for the first slow step to happen.
The slow step of a reaction is known as the rate determining step.
As long as there is a lot of difference between the rates of the various steps, when you measure the rate of a reaction, you are actually measuring the rate of the rate determining step.
Example
By doing rate of reaction experiments, you find this rate equation:
The reaction is first order with respect to the organic compound, and zero order with respect to the hydroxide ions. The concentration of the hydroxide ions isn’t affecting the overall rate of the reaction.
If the hydroxide ions were taking part in the slow step of the reaction, increasing their concentration would speed the reaction up. Since their concentration doesn’t seem to matter, they must be taking part in a later fast step.
Increasing the concentration of the hydroxide ions will speed up the fast step, but that won’t have a noticeable effect on the overall rate of the reaction. That is governed by the speed of the slow step.
This is much easier to talk about with a real example. The equation below shows an organic chemistry reaction in which a bromine atom is being replaced by an OH group in an organic compound. The starting compound is bromoethane, and the organic product is ethanol.
During the reaction one of the lone pairs of electrons on the negatively charged oxygen in the -OH group is attracted to the carbon atom with the bromine attached.
That’s because the bromine is more electronegative than carbon, and so the electron pair in the C-Br bond is slightly closer to the bromine. The carbon atom becomes slightly positively charged and the bromine slightly negative.
As the hydroxide ion approaches the slightly positive carbon, a new bond starts to be set up between the oxygen and the carbon. At the same time, the bond between the carbon and bromine starts to break as the electrons in the bond are repelled towards the bromine.
At some point, the process is exactly half complete. The carbon atom now has the oxygen half-attached, the bromine half-attached, and the three other groups still there, of course.
And then the process completes:
The second diagram where the bonds are half-made and half-broken is called the transition state, and it is at this point that the energy of the system is at its maximum. This is what is at the top of the activation energy barrier.
But the transition state is entirely unstable. Any tiny change in either direction will send it either forward to make the products or back to the reactants again. Neither is there anything special about a transition state except that it has this maximum energy. You can’t isolate it, even for a very short time.
For reasons which you may well meet in the organic chemistry part of your course, a different organic bromine-containing compound reacts with hydroxide ions in an entirely different way.
In this case, the organic compound ionises slightly in a slow reaction to produce an intermediate positive organic ion. This then goes on to react very rapidly with hydroxide ions.
The big difference in this case is that the positively charged organic ion can actually be detected in the mixture. It is very unstable, and soon reacts with a hydroxide ion (or picks up its bromide ion again). But, for however short a time, it does have a real presence in the system. That shows itself in the energy profile.
The stability (however temporary and slight) of the intermediate is shown by the fact that there are small activation barriers to its conversion either into the products or back into the reactants again.
Notice that the barrier on the product side of the intermediate is lower than that on the reactant side. That means that there is a greater chance of it finding the extra bit of energy to convert into products. It would need a greater amount of energy to convert back to the reactants again.
These peaks are labelled “ts1” and “ts2” – they both represent transition states between the intermediate and either the reactants or the products. During either conversion, there will be some arrangement of the atoms which causes an energy maximum .
• For a reaction to take place;
– the reacting molecules should collide.
– the colliding molecules should have a proper orientation.
– the reacting molecules should have kinetic energy greater than or equal to certain minimum value. This minimum value of energy is called activation energy.
Consider a simple reaction involving a collision between two molecules – ethene, CH2=CH2, and hydrogen chloride, HCl, for example. These react to give chloroethane.
As a result of the collision between the two molecules, the double bond between the two carbons is converted into a single bond. A hydrogen atom gets attached to one of the carbons and a chlorine atom to the other.
The reaction can only happen if the hydrogen end of the H-Cl bond approaches the carbon-carbon double bond. Any other collision between the two molecules doesn’t work. The two simply bounce off each other.
Of the collisions shown in the diagram, only collision 1 may possibly lead on to a reaction.
collision 2 won’t work as well. The double bond has a high concentration of negative charge around it due to the electrons in the bonds. The approaching chlorine atom is also slightly negative because it is more electronegative than hydrogen. The repulsion simply causes the molecules to bounce off each other.
Even if the species are orientated properly, you still won’t get a reaction unless the particles collide with a certain minimum energy called the activation energy of the reaction.
Activation energy is the minimum energy required before a reaction can occur. You can show this on an energy profile for the reaction. For a simple over-all exothermic reaction, the energy profile looks like this:
If the particles collide with less energy than the activation energy, nothing important happens. They bounce apart. You can think of the activation energy as a barrier to the reaction. Only those collisions which have energies equal to or greater than the activation energy result in a reaction.
Any chemical reaction results in the breaking of some bonds (needing energy) and the making of new ones (releasing energy). Obviously some bonds have to be broken before new ones can be made. Activation energy is involved in breaking some of the original bonds.
Where collisions are relatively gentle, there isn’t enough energy available to start the bond-breaking process, and so the particles don’t react.
• The rate of reaction depends on the activation energy (Ea). When Ea decreases, the number of molecules which have higher energy than Ea, increases. So, the number of effective collisions increases and the rate is increased.
Notice that the large majority of the particles don’t have enough energy to react when they collide. To enable them to react we either have to change the shape of the curve, or move the activation energy further to the left.
When temperature increases, the kinetic energy and the number of collisions per unit time and per unit volume also increase. Hence, the number of effective collisions per unit time also increases. Thus the rate of reaction increases. The fraction of molecules having energy greater than the activation energy increases rapidly in most reactions even with a small increase in temperature. This can be explained by the Maxwell -Boltzmann energy distribution graphs.
the graph labelled T is at the original temperature. The graph labelled T+t is at a higher temperature.
If you now mark the position of the activation energy, you can see that although the curve hasn’t moved very much overall, there has been such a large increase in the number of the very energetic particles that many more now collide with enough energy to react.
The area under a curve gives a count of the number of particles. On the last diagram, the area under the higher temperature curve to the right of the activation energy looks to have at least doubled – therefore at least doubling the rate of the reaction.
When the concentration of the reactants increases the number of molecules per unit volume increases. Hence, the number of effective collisions per unit volume and per unit time also increases. So, the rate of reaction increases.
Note-In gaseous reactions, when the pressure increases at a constant temperature, the volume decreases. So the concentration increases. In gaseous reactions, the rate of reaction increases with the increasing pressure.
To increase the rate of a reaction you need to increase the number of successful collisions. One possible way of doing this is to provide an alternative way for the reaction to happen which has a lower activation energy.
In other words, to move the activation energy on the graph like this:
Adding a catalyst has exactly this effect on activation energy. A catalyst provides an alternative route for the reaction. That alternative route has a lower activation energy. Showing this on an energy profile:
The smaller the size of solid reactant particles, the greater the surface area with which the reacting molecules can collide. This increases the reaction rate.
e.g. Powdered CaCO3 reacts faster than lumps of CaCO3 with a solution of HCl.
• Amines can be defined as compounds where alkyl or aryl groups are attached to nitrogen in place of hydrogen atoms in ammonia.
Amines are classified as primary, secondary and tertiary. Unlike the alkyl halides and alcohols, the amines are classified according to the number of alkyl or aryl groups attached to the nitrogen atom.
The compounds in which an alkyl or an aryl group is attached in place of one of the three atoms of hydrogen in ammonia are called primary amines.
The compounds in which two alkyl or aryl groups are attached in place of two atoms of hydrogen in ammonia are called secondary amines.
The compounds in which three alkyl or aryl groups are attached in place of the three atoms of hydrogen are called tertiary amines
• The compounds in which at least one aryl group is attached to the nitrogen atom are called aryl amines.
• Aniline readily reacts with bromine water to give a white precipitate as -NH2 group activates benzene ring.
• Amines act as nucleophiles due to the lone pair of electrons on the nitrogen atom. The following are some of the reactions of primary amines with various reagents where the amine acts as a nucleophile.
(i) With acid chlorides
(ii) With aldehydes and ketones
(iii) With alkyl halides
(iv) With NaNO2/HCl (Nitrous acid)
Primary amines react with nitrous acid to form diazonium salts. As alkyl diazonium salts are unstable they rapidly convert to alcohols with the evolution of nitrogen gas.
Aromatic diazonium salts formed from aryl amines are more stable particularly at low temperatures.
• Dilute mineral acids convert amines into their salts. These salts react with aqueous hydroxides to regenerate the amine.
Hence it is clear that although amines are more basic than water, they are less basic than hydroxide ions.
• Amines are more basic than alcohols
R-OH + H+ ⇌ ROH2+ Alkyl oxonium ion
R-NH2 + H+ ⇌ RNH3+ Alkyl ammonium ion
As nitrogen is less electronegative than oxygen it has a higher tendency to donate lone pair of electrons. Hence the stability of the alkyl ammonium ion relative to the amine is stronger than the stability of the alkyl oxonium ion relative to the alcohol. The reason for this is that an atom with low electronegativity can bear a positive charge more easily.
• Aliphatic primary amines are more basic than aniline. The reason for the low basicity of aniline is because the lone pair of electrons on the nitrogen of aniline is not easily available to a proton due to it being delocalized on to the aromatic ring by resonance.
• Amides are less basic than amines. It is because the pair of electrons on the nitrogen of the amide group is delocalized on to the carbonyl group by resonance.
• Aniline reacts with nitrous acid to give phenol.
Aromatic diazonium salts are more stable than aliphatic diazonium salts. Therefore, when this reaction is carried out at low temperatures, the conversion of the aromatic diazonium salt to the phenol can be slowed down, and the diazonium salt can be isolated.
With water
With CuCl,CuBr,KI and HBF4
With CuCN
C6H5N2+ + CuCN → C6H5CN + Cu+ + N2
Benzene diazonuim chloride reacts with phenol to give an orange coloured compound, and with β -naphthol to give a red coloured compound.
(i) Reaction with sodium hydroxide
Acid chlorides react with NaOH to form the corresponding carboxylic acid which reacts with excess NaOH to form its sodium salt.
Mechanism of the reaction
(ii) Reaction with water
Acid chlorides also react with water by a similar mechanism to form the corresponding carboxylic acid.
(iii) Reaction with alcohols
Acid chlorides react with alcohols to form esters
(iv) Reaction with phenol
Acid chlorides react with phenol to form phenyl esters.
(v) Reaction with NH3
Acid chlorides react with ammonia to form amides
(vi) Reaction with primary amines
Acidchlorides react with amines to form alkyl amines.
(i) Esters undergo hydrolysis with dilute acids to form the corresponding carboxylic acid and the alcohol.
(ii) Esters when reacted with aqueous NaOH form the sodium salt of corresponding carboxylic acid and the alcohol.
(iii) With Grignard reagent
Esters react with Grignard reagents to give tertiary alcohols. Here, the ester is first converted to a ketone which reacts rapidly with the Grignard reagent again to give the product.
(iv) Reduction by LiAlH4
(i) With NaOH
When amides are warmed with an aqueous solution of NaOH, NH3 is liberated and the sodium salt of the corresponding carboxylic acid is formed.
(ii) With LiAlH4
Amides are reduced to the corresponding primary amine with LiAlH4
